Pure Global

Pragmatic Trial to Enhance Quality Safety, and Patient Experience in COPD - Trial NCT05718102

Access comprehensive clinical trial information for NCT05718102 through Pure Global AI's free database. This phase not specified trial is sponsored by Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research and is currently Not yet recruiting. The study focuses on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive. Target enrollment is 4000 participants.

This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to ClinicalTrials.gov data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.

Free Database
Powered by Pure Global AI
840K+ Trials
NCT05718102
Not yet recruiting
other
Trial Details
ClinicalTrials.gov โ€ข NCT05718102
View on ClinicalTrials.gov
Pure Global
DJ Fang

DJ Fang

MedTech Regulatory Expert

Need help with 30+ markets registration?

Pricing
Pragmatic Trial to Enhance Quality Safety, and Patient Experience in COPD

Study Focus

Population-health management

Interventional

other

Sponsor & Location

Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research

Minneapolis,Portland,Charleston,Seattle,Spokane, United States of America

Timeline & Enrollment

N/A

May 16, 2023

Jan 01, 2027

4000 participants

Primary Outcome

Quality of COPD care,COPD-related quality- of-life,Proportion of patients with COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, hospitalization, or Death (composite outcome)

Summary

Background: Over 26 million Americans have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),
 which is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Unfortunately, few patients
 receive proven therapies and many receive therapies known to have safer alternatives. One
 major reason is the competing demands of primary care providers (PCPs) who manage 90% of
 patients with COPD. The research team has developed a population management approach where
 pulmonary specialists provide evidence-based recommendations as an E-consult with unsigned
 orders to PCPs. PCPs can then quickly review the E-consult and sign, modify, or discontinue
 these orders. The investigators found this intervention led to marked improvements in the
 quality-of-care delivered and patients' COPD-related quality-of-life. While promising, this
 approach is limited by a paucity of pulmonary providers nationwide. Clinical pharmacists are
 20 times more prevalent as pulmonary specialists and some regions of VA (VISN 17, COPD Cares)
 have assigned clinical pharmacists a role in the management of patients with COPD. However,
 the relative effectiveness of pharmacist-led management is yet to be established.
 
 Study Description: The goal is to determine if two forms of usual care population management
 among patients with COPD is as good as when provided by a pharmacist relative to a pulmonary
 specialist. The investigators are conducting a cluster randomized clinical trial at five
 medical centers and their associated clinics within the Department of Veterans Affair. Study
 staff will randomize PCPs to population management conducted by either pulmonary specialists
 or pharmacists. Within PCPs' panels, study staff will use VA electronic health record to
 identify patients with evidence of COPD. Pulmonologists and pharmacists will review these
 patients and provide guideline-based recommendations to PCPs. Pulmonary specialists and
 pharmacists will then deliver evidence-based recommendations through E-consults coupled with
 unsigned orders for primary care providers to sign, modify or decline.
 
 Outcomes: Investigators will assess if proactive, population management recommendations by
 clinical pharmacists and pulmonary specialists lead to non-inferior outcomes for patients
 with COPD. Primary outcomes will be 1) the proportion of guideline recommended therapies
 received by patients, 2) COPD-related quality-of-life as measured by the Clinical COPD
 Questionnaire, and 3) composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, hospitalization, or
 death six month after intervention. Secondary outcomes will include PCP acceptance of
 recommendations, and each individual outcome within the primary composite endpoint above.

ICD-10 Classifications

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified
Other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Other specified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, unspecified
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute lower respiratory infection

Data Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT05718102

Non-Device Trial