Pure Global

REPEAT INDUCTION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT AFTER FAILED PRIMARY LABOR INDUCTION AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL. - Trial PACTR201805002872322

Access comprehensive clinical trial information for PACTR201805002872322 through Pure Global AI's free database. This Not Applicable trial is sponsored by RESEARCH & PROGRAMS: KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL and is currently Not yet recruiting. The study focuses on Pregnancy and Childbirth; Other.

This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.

Free Database
Powered by Pure Global AI
840K+ Trials
PACTR201805002872322
Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Trial Details
Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry โ€ข PACTR201805002872322
Pure Global
DJ Fang

DJ Fang

MedTech Regulatory Expert

Need help with 30+ markets registration?

Pricing
REPEAT INDUCTION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT AFTER FAILED PRIMARY LABOR INDUCTION AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.

Study Focus

Sponsor & Location

RESEARCH & PROGRAMS: KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL

Kenya

Timeline & Enrollment

Not Applicable

Dec 25, 2017

May 31, 2018

Summary

BACKGROUND: While the rates of labor induction have increased globally,occurring in about 20% of almost all settings, Africa reports of an average rate of 4.4% (Kenya 3.9%) with a high rate of unmet need (66.0 ยฟ80.2%), which is a clear indicator for poor quality obstetric care as well as inadequate access to reproductive health care. Despite it being a common obstetric procedure, criteria for successful and failed induction of labor (IOL) have not been standardized and no universal consensus has been reached to date hence caesarean delivery is often erroneously perceived to be the solution to failed labor induction. Primary caesarean delivery (CS) rate due to failed IOL in Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) is reported at 51.5% in contrast to 10% in the United States (U.S) and 3% in Australia. The need for uniformity in its definition and management in creating standards on both the duration and number of times the induction can be attempted emerges within this contextual framework and this creates necessity to study the value of repeat induction after failed primary labor induction. BROAD OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of repeat induction versus expectant management after failed primary labor induction on reducing rates of subsequent failed induction at KNH. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:1)To compare the final mode of delivery between women randomized to repeat induction and those randomized to expectant management following failed primary induction of labor at KNH.2)To compare time from induction to active phase of labor, time from induction to second stage (induction-delivery interval) and time from induction to decision for CS between women undergoing repeat induction versus expectant management at KNH following failed primary induction of labor.3)To compare the rates of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between women undergoing repeat induction versus expectant management at KNH following failed primary induction of labor.

ICD-10 Classifications

Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
Fetus and newborn affected by maternal factors and by complications of pregnancy, labour and delivery
Fetus and newborn affected by other complications of labour and delivery
Fetus and newborn affected by other specified complications of labour and delivery
Fetus and newborn affected by other maternal complications of pregnancy

Data Source

Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry

PACTR201805002872322

Non-Device Trial